SRE Build and Consulting Pod

Build the infrastructure foundation that your team has been skipping.

talk to sales
Two businessmen sitting at office desk

You've been shipping fast. Your infrastructure hasn't kept up.

Most engineering teams reach the same inflection point. The product is working. The team is growing. And then something that shouldn't be a big deal becomes a very big deal, because the infrastructure holding everything up was never designed for where you are now.

  • Infrastructure provisioned by hand. No IaC, no version control, no repeatable deployments
  • Monitoring that generates noise but not signal. Alerts with no escalation path, no SLO context
  • CI/CD pipelines that were bolted on incrementally and nobody fully understands anymore
  • No defined SLOs or error budgets, so every incident is a political negotiation, not a measured response
  • A compliance audit (SOC 2, ISO 27001) that has surfaced gaps in architecture documentation and access controls
  • Senior engineers spending their time on infrastructure toil that should be automated

The instinct is to fix it gradually, squeeze it in between feature sprints, and assign it to whoever has a spare cycle. That approach produces patchy results because no one owns the full picture long enough.

The faster path is a dedicated engagement with Maxima’s SRE pod: full focus, a defined scope, and working deliverables at the end of every month.

What "Built Properly" actually looks like

That's the state a well-scoped SRE build engagement produces. Not a slide deck with recommendations. Not a discovery.

Working assets, code, configuration, and documentation that your team can open, run, modify, and operate the day the engagement closes.

"Your infrastructure is in version control. Your monitors are tied to SLOs. Your pipelines arereproducible. Your team knows what to do when something goes wrong, because the runbook existsand it's accurate."
Avatar photo
Prasad Durgaoli, Director of Infrastructure

Architecture you can trust

An SRE Architect reviews your current state, identifies risk, and designs the target state with decisions documented and rationale explained.

Icon representing a business briefcase

IaC you actually own

Terraform and Ansible modules written to your stack and committed to your repo. No proprietary wrappers. No black boxes you can't modify.

Monitoring tied to what matters

Datadog (or your platform of choice) configured against defined SLOs, not just resource utilization metrics that don't connect to user experience.

Icon representing savings

SLOs and error budgets that work

Service Level Objectives defined for your critical services, with error budget policy agreed by engineering and product, so reliability decisions have a framework.

Pipelines that are reproducible

CI/CD pipelines rebuilt or refactored to be consistent, tested, and documented so deployments are boring in exactly the right way.

Clean handover, full ownership

All IP, code, config, and documentation transfers to you at close. Structured handover session included. No ongoing dependency on Maxima to operate it.

An architect and an engineer. Focused on one thing.

The pod is deliberately small. Two senior engineers, one setting direction, one building, move faster and produce more coherent output than a larger team negotiating priorities. Every month delivers 1–2 major infrastructure epics as working, committed assets.

Role

What they own

SRE Architect (Lead)

Architecture reviews, SLO and error budget definitions, technical strategy, client communication, epic scoping and acceptance

DevOps / SRE Engineer

Writing Terraform and Ansible, building and refactoring CI/CD pipelines, monitoring configuration (Datadog, Prometheus, Grafana), runbook authoring

$20,000 per month · 2–3 month engagement with a fixed rate, no change orders for agreed scope. The plan can be customized based on your needs.

What a major infrastructure epic looks like in practice

Every engagement is scoped to your situation. These are representative examples of the epics we deliver. Each one a working, committed asset, not a report or a recommendation.

EPIC · MONTH 1

Infrastructure as Code foundation

Full Terraform module library for your cloud environment (VPC, compute, database, IAM) committed to your repo with state management configured and documented.

EPIC · MONTH 1

Observability stack setup

Datadog (or Prometheus/Grafana) configured against your services, dashboards built for critical paths, alert policies tied to SLO thresholds rather than raw resource metrics.

EPIC · MONTH 2

SLO & Error budget implementation

SLOs defined for 3–5 critical services, error budget policy agreed with product and engineering, burn rate alerts configured, and a one-page reliability charter documented.

EPIC · MONTH 2

CI/CD pipeline rebuild

Deployment pipelines refactored or rebuilt in GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or ArgoCD. Consistent environments, test gates enforced, rollback paths defined and tested.

EPIC · MONTH 3

Runbook library

Operational runbooks written for your top 10 incident types. Formatted, version-controlled, and cross-referenced to your alerting and escalation policy.

EPIC · MONTH 3

Architecture review & documentation

Current-state architecture documented, risk assessment completed, target-state design produced. Packaged for engineering leadership and, where relevant, compliance auditors.

Scoped, delivered, and handed over. Three months, clean close.

The pod runs on a two-week sprint cadence. Each sprint produces working software, not documentation.

Week 1-2

Discovery & scope definition

The SRE Architect runs a structured review of your current infrastructure, toolchain, and pain points. You leave with a written scope document with epics prioritized by risk and impact, delivery timeline per month, and acceptance criteria for every major deliverable. No work begins until the scope is signed off.

Arrow in the process
Month 1

First Epic delivery

The DevOps/SRE Engineer starts building. Weekly check-ins with your engineering lead. Code committed to your repo incrementally, not delivered as a single drop at the end of the month. Month-end review confirms acceptance of Epic 1 and refines the scope for Month 2 based on what was learned.

Arrow in the process
Month 2-3

Remaining Epics & iIntegration

Subsequent epics are built in the same cadence. Where epics are interdependent (for example, IaC foundation enabling monitoring config) the Architect sequences them to avoid rework. Your engineers are invited to review, contribute, and ask questions throughout. The goal is knowledge transfer, not dependency.

Arrow in the process
Close

Handover session & full IP transfer

A structured handover session with your engineering team, walkthrough of all deliverables, Q&A, and confirmation that your team can operate what was built. All code, configuration, documentation, and runbooks transfer to you. Maxima retains nothing proprietary. The engagement ends cleanly.

The right trigger for SRE Pod engagement

The SRE Build Pod is a project engagement, not a retainer. It's the right choice when you have a specific infrastructure gap to close and want it done in a defined window, not dragged out across quarters.

You're pre- or post-Series A, and infrastructure is now a board-level concern

Investors ask about reliability. Compliance teams ask about documentation. The informal approach that worked for 20 engineers doesn't hold up at 80.

A compliance audit has exposed gaps you need to close

SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, or a customer security review has flagged infrastructure documentation, access control, or change management gaps. You need fixes, not findings.

You're migrating cloud platforms or re-architecting for scale

A significant infrastructure change is coming. Doing it on top of an unstructured current state multiplies the risk. A clean SRE foundation before the migration makes everything that follows cheaper.

You want to hand off to a managed service after the build

The SRE Build Pod pairs naturally with the Managed Service Pod. Build the foundation properly, then hand it to a dedicated ops team to run, without the build team having to stay on indefinitely to maintain what they created.

140+

Enterprise applications maintained in production during a Tier-1 insurer's large-scale modernization program.

90 days

Typical engagement window from first architecture review to final handover, with working deliverables every month.

CMMI 3

Process maturity certification, the foundation for consistent, auditable delivery that compliance requirements demand.

0

Proprietary platforms or tools required, all deliverables use your existing stack and live in your own repositories

Senior SRE practitioners. Not junior consultants with a checklist.

Our SRE Architects have operated production infrastructure at enterprise scale, not just designed it. That gap between theory and practice is where most consulting engagements fail.

Frequently asked questions

What does the SRE Build Pod actually deliver?
The SRE Build Pod delivers 1–2 major infrastructure epics per month over a 2–3 month engagement. Typical outputs include: Infrastructure as Code templates (Terraform, Ansible), monitoring and observability setup (Datadog, Prometheus, Grafana), SLO and error budget definitions, CI/CD pipeline implementation, and architecture review documentation. All assets are transferred to the client at close — no proprietary tooling, no vendor lock-in, no ongoing dependency on Maxima to operate what was built.
How is this different from ongoing managed SRE support?
The SRE Build Pod is a project engagement — a 2–3 month sprint to design and build the SRE foundation your team will then operate. It produces assets: IaC templates, runbooks, monitoring configs, SLO definitions, pipelines. The Managed Service Pod is an ongoing retainer where a dedicated team handles alert triage, patching, incident response, and uptime reporting indefinitely. The two are complementary: the Build Pod creates the foundation; the Managed Pod runs it. Clients often transition from one to the other.
What tools and platforms does the pod work with?
The pod works across AWS, GCP, and Azure, and adopts your existing toolchain wherever possible. Standard implementation experience covers Terraform, Ansible, Datadog, Prometheus, Grafana, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, and ArgoCD. The architecture review and SLO definitions are tool-agnostic — the SRE Architect recommends based on your environment and scale, not a preferred vendor stack. If you are early-stage and haven't committed to a toolchain yet, the architect will advise on selection during the first sprint.
Can my engineers work alongside the pod during the engagement?
Yes — and it's encouraged. The engagement is structured so your engineers can pair with the pod on implementation work, attend architecture review sessions, and participate in sprint demos. Knowledge transfer is built into the process, not bolted on at the end. The goal is that your team understands and can own what was built from day one of handover, not after a separate training programme. The level of involvement is agreed during onboarding and adjusted to your team's availability.
What happens at the end of the engagement?
At close, the client takes full ownership of all deliverables — IaC templates, monitoring configuration, runbooks, SLO documentation, and CI/CD pipelines — committed to your own repositories. The final sprint includes a structured handover session with your internal team covering how to operate, extend, and troubleshoot what was built. There is no proprietary platform dependency and no ongoing licensing cost tied to Maxima's involvement. Clients who want ongoing operational support can transition to the Managed Service Pod retainer.
Is the $20,000/month rate fixed, or can scope change mid-engagement?
The $20,000/month rate is fixed for the scope agreed at the kickoff session. Scope is defined in writing before work begins — specific epics, deliverables, and acceptance criteria — so both sides have a clear baseline. If a material scope change is needed mid-engagement (for example, a new workload is added or priorities shift significantly), it is handled via a written scope amendment agreed before additional work starts. There are no surprise overages; any change to scope is a deliberate conversation, not a unilateral billing adjustment.

Ready to build the SRE foundation properly?

If your infrastructure is outpacing your ability to operate it reliably, book a 30-minute architecture review call. We'll map the gaps, propose an epic scope, and give you a clear picture of what 90 days looks like.

Thank you!
Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.